Fee v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fee v. City of New York

259 A.D.2d 661, 685 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2727

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 1999·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Jamaica Water Supply Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated February 9, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment [662] on its third cross claim against the defendant TPK Construction Corp.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs (see, Watkins v TPK Constr. Corp., 259 AD2d 695 [decided herewith]). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Jamaica Water Supply Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated February 9, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment [662] on its third cross claim against the defendant TPK Construction Corp.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs (see, Watkins v TPK Constr. Corp., 259 AD2d 695 [decided herewith]). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Fee v. City of New York, 259 A.D.2d 661, 685 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

259 A.D.2d 661 (Fee v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related