Fee, Jack v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.

2020 TN WC 9
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJanuary 27, 2020
Docket2019-01-0396
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 9 (Fee, Jack v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fee, Jack v. Mohawk Industries, Inc., 2020 TN WC 9 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

FILED Jan 27, 2020

10:38 AM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Jack Fee, ) Docket No. 2019-01-0396 Employee, )

Vv. )

Mohawk Industries, Inc., ) State File No. 38017-2019 Employer, )

And )

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on January 16, 2020, to determine whether Tennessee has jurisdiction over Mr. Fee’s workers’ compensation claim. Mohawk asserted that Georgia Workers’ Compensation Law is Mr. Fee’s exclusive remedy. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Tennessee does not have jurisdiction.

History of Claim

Mr. Fee, a Georgia resident, worked as an over-the-road driver for Mohawk, a Georgia corporation, when he sustained serious injuries during a motor vehicle accident while driving through Tennessee. Mr. Fee’s delivery route from Georgia to Maryland required him to drive through Tennessee three times per week for approximately three hours each trip. Mohawk accepted Mr. Fee’s claim under Georgia’s workers’ compensation law and paid for all of his medical treatment.'

Mr. Fee filed a Petition for Benefit Determination seeking Tennessee benefits and later filed a Request for Expedited Hearing for a determination regarding jurisdiction. Mohawk argued Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-115(a) and (c)(2) provides that Georgia law is Mr. Fee’s exclusive remedy.

' It is unclear from Mr. Fee’s testimony whether he received any temporary disability benefits.

1 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To prevail at an expedited hearing, Mr. Fee must show a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019). The Court holds he did not.

Jurisdiction

The 2013 Workers’ Compensation Reform Act substantially changed Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-115, which is the extraterritorial statute that previously dealt only with employees injured out-of-state. The Reform added, in part, subsections (a) and (c)(2):

(a) For purposes of this section, an employee is considered to be temporarily in a state working for an employer if the employee is working for such employee’s employer in a state other than the state where such employee is primarily employed for no more than fourteen (14) consecutive days, or no more than twenty-five (25) days total, during a calendar year.

(c)(2) The benefits under the workers’ compensation insurance or similar laws of the other state, or other remedies under similar law, are the exclusive remedy against the employer for any injury, whether resulting in death or not, received by the employee while temporarily working for that employer in this state.

With no guiding post-Reform case law, the Court considers the application of the statutory language. Hadzic v. Averitt Express, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *8 (May 18, 2015) (courts must consider the plain and ordinary meaning of the statutory language when no guiding precedent exists). Here, it is undisputed that Mr. Fee, a Georgia resident, was “primarily employed” in Georgia. It is also undisputed that Mr. Fee’s time spent in Tennessee consisted of approximately three hours on the interstate, three times per week, traveling from Georgia to Maryland. Mr. Fee drove that route for two to three months before his accident. The Court finds that he was “temporarily” working in Tennessee. Under section 50-6-115, the fact that Mr. Fee’s accident occurred in Tennessee is not sufficient to give Tennessee jurisdiction. Therefore, as directed by subsection (c)(2), the Court holds that Georgia has exclusive Jurisdiction of Mr. Fee’s workers’ compensation claim.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Tennessee does not have jurisdiction over Mr. Fee’s workers’ compensation claim. 2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, March 25, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED January 27, 2020.

iN iN

ChuAdnwo, NS bo 0 NaS AUDREY A. HEADRICK Workers’ Compensation Judge

APPENDIX

Exhibits: 1. Affidavit of Mr. Fee

Technical record:

Petition for Benefit Determination Dispute Certification Notice Request for Expedited Hearing Show Cause Order

Order on Show Cause Hearing Notice of Expedited Hearing

DAARWN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on January 27,

2020. Name Certified Email Service sent to: Mail Scott Wesson, Xx scottwesson@warrenandgriffin.com Employee’s Attorney kay@warrenandgriffin.com Bryan Lindberg, Xx blindberg@hallboothsmith.com

Employer’s Attorney

{ f La Stun Maes

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK |!

we.courtclerk@tn.gov

ayy)

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. Ifa transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business days after you file your position statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fee-jack-v-mohawk-industries-inc-tennworkcompcl-2020.