Fedora v. Fedora
This text of 60 A.D.2d 904 (Fedora v. Fedora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a divorce action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 2, 1977, which denied her motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amended complaint gives specific times and places for several of the alleged acts of cruel and inhuman treatment. Thus, the minimum requirements of the statute have been met. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.2d 904, 401 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fedora-v-fedora-nyappdiv-1978.