Fedick v. State

268 So. 2d 392, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5984
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1972·No. No. R-101·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. State v. Polo (Fla.1971) 242 So.2d 457; Belger v. State (Fla.App.1965) 171 So.2d 574.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fedick v. State, 268 So. 2d 392, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5984 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

268 So. 2d 392 (Fedick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belger v. State
171 So. 2d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
State v. Polo
242 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)