FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Grace Rose Farms, LLC

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 8, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-08131·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08131-SB-PD Document 27 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:556

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, Case No. 2:22-cv-08131-SB-PD INC.,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL v. AND DENYING STIPULATION TO RETAIN JURISDICTION GRACE ROSE FARMS, LLC,

Defendant.

Following the parties’ notice of settlement, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice on January 19, 2023, ordering that the dismissal would convert to a dismissal with prejudice after 60 days. Dkt. No. 25. On February 8, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the case with prejudice with the Court retaining jurisdiction through June 28, 2026, the final date of the parties’ agreed payment plan. Dkt. No. 26. The stipulation is GRANTED in part, and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. This case has now concluded, and the Court declines to retain jurisdiction as requested. See Arata v. Nu Skin Int’l, Inc., 96 F.3d 1265, 1269 (9th Cir. 1996) (noting that a “district court was under no obligation to reserve [ancillary] jurisdiction” to enforce compliance with a settlement agreement).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: February 8, 2023 ___________________________ Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Grace Rose Farms, LLC, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Grace Rose Farms, LLC (FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Grace Rose Farms, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arata v. Nu Skin International, Inc.
96 F.3d 1265 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)