Federov v. United States

588 A.2d 1176, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 105, 1991 WL 60876
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1991·No. Nos. M15071-87; 88-240, M15072-87; 88-242 and M15626-87; 88-531·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted [1177]*1177and that the opinion and judgment of September 6, 1990, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before April 26, 1991.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federov v. United States, 588 A.2d 1176, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 105, 1991 WL 60876 (D.C. 1991).

588 A.2d 1176 (Federov v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fedorov v. United States
600 A.2d 370 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)