Federico Garcia Revazquez v. David M. Heritage, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

Fifth Circuit

Federico Garcia Revazquez v. David M. Heritage, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

319 F.2d 818

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 2, 1963

Docket20329_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 319 F.2d 818 (Federico Garcia Revazquez v. David M. Heritage, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federico Garcia Revazquez v. David M. Heritage, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, 319 F.2d 818 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, being under sentence of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, a court established by an Act of Congress, Balzac v. People of Puerto Rico, 1922, 258 U.S. 298, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed. 627, sought and was denied habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia where he is imprisoned. His remedy is under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and not by way of habeas corpus in the District Court of his incarceration. All other and further questions,presented by the appeal are for the § 2255 court. Rivera v. Heritage, Warden, 5 Cir., 1963, 314 F.2d 332, and Montes v. Heritage, 5 Cir., 1963, 314 F.2d 332.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, being under sentence of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, a court established by an Act of Congress, Balzac v. People of Puerto Rico, 1922, 258 U.S. 298, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed. 627, sought and was denied habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia where he is imprisoned. His remedy is under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and not by way of habeas corpus in the District Court of his incarceration. All other and further questions,presented by the appeal are for the § 2255 court. Rivera v. Heritage, Warden, 5 Cir., 1963, 314 F.2d 332, and Montes v. Heritage, 5 Cir., 1963, 314 F.2d 332.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 F.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federico-garcia-revazquez-v-david-m-heritage-warden-u-s-penitentiary-ca5-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack