Federico Ceballos Dominguez v. Robert I. Moseley, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
This text of 431 F.2d 1376 (Federico Ceballos Dominguez v. Robert I. Moseley, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dominguez was notified that the court was considering summary affirmance and afforded an opportunity to oppose such disposition by filing a memorandum addressing the merits of the cause. He has submitted a brief, filed-at the time of docketing, and a supplemental pleading since then. Examination of the file and records in this case prompts the conclusion that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as not to warrant further argument.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order, 317 F.Supp. 10 (D.Kan.1970). See also Dearman v. Woodson, 429 F.2d 1288 (10th Cir., 1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 F.2d 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federico-ceballos-dominguez-v-robert-i-moseley-warden-u-s-ca10-1970.