Federico A. Tellez v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-10-00298-CR & 04-10-00299-CR
Federico A. TELLEZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2005-CR-1850 & 2005-CR-3527 Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 2, 2011
AFFIRMED
Based on Frederico Tellez’s pleas of true to violating the terms of his community
supervision, the trial court revoked Tellez’s community supervision and sentenced him to five
years imprisonment in each of the underlying causes. Tellez’s court-appointed attorney filed a
brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that these appeals have no merit. Counsel provided
Tellez with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his 04-10-00298-CR & 04-10-00299-CR
own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.);
Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Tellez did not
file a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeals are frivolous
and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed. Appellate counsel’s motion to
withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute
counsel will be appointed. Should Tellez wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, Tellez must either retain an attorney to file a petition for
discretionary review or Tellez must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition
for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or
the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2.
Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be
forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition
for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Federico A. Tellez v. State (Federico A. Tellez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.