Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing Board

613 A.2d 1205, 531 Pa. 454, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 481
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 14, 1992·No. Appeal No. 61 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[455]*455ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Motion to Quash Appeal is GRANTED. A Zoning Hearing Board has no standing to appeal from a decision of a reviewing Court which involves one of its own decisions. See Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Association, 505 Pa. 614, 483 A.2d 448 (1984); Edwards Zoning Case, 392 Pa. 188, 140 A.2d 110 (1958); Lansdowne Board of Adjustment’s Appeal, 313 Pa. 523, 170 A. 867 (1934).

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. CAPPY, J., dissents and would reach the merits of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing Board, 613 A.2d 1205, 531 Pa. 454, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 481 (Pa. 1992).

613 A.2d 1205 (Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drummond v. University of Pennsylvania
651 A.2d 572 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Gwynedd Properties, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
635 A.2d 714 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)