Federation of Puerto Rican Organizations of Brownsville, Inc. v. Mateo
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered April 4, 1996, which denied defendants’ motion to reargue, denominated a motion to vacate a default, unanimously dismissed as taken from a nonappealable order, without costs.
[327] Although denominated a motion to vacate a default, defendants’ motion was, in actuality, one to reargue the prior order that had conditionally struck their answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3), rendering the instant order nonappealable (see, Berman v Szpilzinger, 180 AD2d 612). In any event, if we were to review, we would find that defendants provided neither a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply with the conditional order nor an affidavit of merit by one with personal knowledge of the facts (see, Becerril v Skate Way Roller Rink, 184 AD2d 365, 366). Concur—Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 A.D.2d 326 (Federation of Puerto Rican Organizations of Brownsville, Inc. v. Mateo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.