Federation Bank & Trust Co. v. Andrew Jackson Apartments, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Federation Bank & Trust Co. v. Andrew Jackson Apartments, Inc.

255 A.D. 878, 7 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5738

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. Defendant-owner appeals from the order granting plaintiff’s motion for reargument of its motion for summary judgment and on reargument granting the motion to strike out said defendant’s answer, directing a reference to compute and judgment of foreclosure and sale. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The facts pleaded in the complaint are not in dispute. Defendant-owner pleaded as a defense that by reason of certain transactions between the parties the maintenance of the action by plaintiff is inequitable and unconscionable and that plaintiff is estopped from maintaining it. Defendant-owner submitted no proofs efficient to defeat the motion. The issue tendered is not genuine but feigned; there is in truth nothing to be tried. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 270.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [168 Misc. 328.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. Defendant-owner appeals from the order granting plaintiff’s motion for reargument of its motion for summary judgment and on reargument granting the motion to strike out said defendant’s answer, directing a reference to compute and judgment of foreclosure and sale. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The facts pleaded in the complaint are not in dispute. Defendant-owner pleaded as a defense that by reason of certain transactions between the parties the maintenance of the action by plaintiff is inequitable and unconscionable and that plaintiff is estopped from maintaining it. Defendant-owner submitted no proofs efficient to defeat the motion. The issue tendered is not genuine but feigned; there is in truth nothing to be tried. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 270.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [168 Misc. 328.]

Federation Bank & Trust Co. v. Andrew Jackson Apartments, Inc., 255 A.D. 878, 7 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 878 (Federation Bank & Trust Co. v. Andrew Jackson Apartments, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related