Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Gerosa

New York Court of Appeals

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Gerosa

215 N.E.2d 516, 17 N.Y.2d 579, 268 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1592

DecidedFebruary 17, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 215 N.E.2d 516 (Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Gerosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Gerosa, 215 N.E.2d 516, 17 N.Y.2d 579, 268 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1592 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon this appeal there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant argued that the formula under which respondent, the Comptroller of the City of New York, allocated a portion of appellant’s interstate receipts to be taxed by the City of New York, on its face and as construed and applied to appellant, violated the commerce clause of the said Constitution and the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment thereto. The Court of Appeals held that the said formula did not violate any of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 16 N Y 2d 320.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon this appeal there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant argued that the formula under which respondent, the Comptroller of the City of New York, allocated a portion of appellant’s interstate receipts to be taxed by the City of New York, on its face and as construed and applied to appellant, violated the commerce clause of the said Constitution and the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment thereto. The Court of Appeals held that the said formula did not violate any of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 16 N Y 2d 320.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 N.E.2d 516, 17 N.Y.2d 579, 268 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federated-department-stores-inc-v-gerosa-ny-1966.