Federated Capital Corporation v. Kevin Betskoff

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 14, 2013
Docket13-1635
StatusUnpublished

This text of Federated Capital Corporation v. Kevin Betskoff (Federated Capital Corporation v. Kevin Betskoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federated Capital Corporation v. Kevin Betskoff, (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1635

FEDERATED CAPITAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Federated Financial Corporation of America,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN C. BETSKOFF, d/b/a Keymar Financial SVC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00538-CCB)

Submitted: August 5, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin C. Betskoff, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Saunders Litman, LITMAN LAW OFFICE, Lansdale, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin C. Betskoff seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion to reconsider its order remanding his

case to Utah state court, from which Betskoff had attempted to

remove it. But we lack jurisdiction to consider such a claim

because, subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order

remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is

not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447(d)

(West Supp. 2013); see also E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.,

____ F.3d , 2013 WL 3487397, at *6 (4th Cir. July 12, 2013)

(No. 12-2207).

We therefore dismiss Betskoff’s appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the material before this court and

argument will not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.
722 F.3d 574 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Federated Capital Corporation v. Kevin Betskoff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federated-capital-corporation-v-kevin-betskoff-ca4-2013.