Federated Capital Corp. v. Betskoff

538 F. App'x 254
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 14, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1635
StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 254 (Federated Capital Corp. v. Betskoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federated Capital Corp. v. Betskoff, 538 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin C. Betskoff seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its order remanding his case to Utah state court, from which Betskoff had attempted to remove it. But we lack jurisdiction to consider such a claim because, subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447(d) (West Supp.2013); see also E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 581-83, 2013 WL 3487397, at *6 (4th Cir. July 12, 2013) (No. 12-2207).

We therefore dismiss Betskoffs appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.
722 F.3d 574 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federated-capital-corp-v-betskoff-ca4-2013.