Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Thompson

148 S.W.2d 1092, 136 Tex. 194, 1941 Tex. LEXIS 318
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 12, 1941
DocketNo. 7722.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 148 S.W.2d 1092 (Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Thompson, 148 S.W.2d 1092, 136 Tex. 194, 1941 Tex. LEXIS 318 (Tex. 1941).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Critz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. It was filed in the District Court of Hardin County, Texas, by D. A. Thompson against Federal Underwriters Exchange to recover compensation for injuries resulting from a hernia alleged to have been received by Thompson while working in the course of his employment for Peavy-Moore Lumber Company. Federal Underwriters Exchange was the Lumber Company’s compensation insurance carrier. The Industrial Accident Board rendered a final award adverse to Thompson in toto, thereby refusing him *196 any compensation whatever. Thompson appealed to the district court, where he contended for- and was awarded a ju4gment against the above-named insurance carrier as for a general injury. On appeal this judgment was affirmed by the Beaumont Court of Civil Appeals. 137 S. W. (2d) 106. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals makes a correct and comprehensive statement of the facts and issues involved. In the interest of brevity we refer to that opinion for a further statement.

A reading of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in connection with our opinion in Cause No. 7721, National Mutual Casualty Company v. Thomas Jefferson Lowery, this day decided by this Court, this volume 188, 148 S. W. (2d)! 1089, will disclose that the question as to whether Thompson should be compensated as for general injuries, is decided in favor of Thompson by our opinion in the Lowery case just mentioned. The ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is in harmony with our ruling in the Lowery case, supra.

We are in accord with the Court of Civil Appeals on the other question discussed by it.

The judgments of the district court and the Court of Civil Appeals are both affirmed. !

Opinion delivered February 12, 1941.

On rehearing the judgment in this case was set aside; the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals were reversed, and an agreed judgment entered in accordance with motion on file, which was signed by all parties. Order entered March 26, 1941.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dieter v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
403 S.W.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Seelbach
328 S.W.2d 346 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Great American Indemnity Company v. Gravell
297 S.W.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1956)
American General Insurance Company v. Quinn
277 S.W.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Kubiak
276 S.W.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wright
196 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Lewis v. American Surety Co.
184 S.W.2d 137 (Texas Supreme Court, 1944)
American Surety Co. of New York v. Lewis
180 S.W.2d 988 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.W.2d 1092, 136 Tex. 194, 1941 Tex. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-underwriters-exchange-v-thompson-tex-1941.