Federal Trade Commission v. The Cement Institute
This text of 334 U.S. 839 (Federal Trade Commission v. The Cement Institute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
334 U.S. 839
68 S.Ct. 1492
92 L.Ed. 1764
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, petitioner,
v.
The CEMENT INSTITUTE et al.
No. 23.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, petitioner,
v.
AETNA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY et al.
No. 24.
CALAVARAS CEMENT COMPANY et al.
No. 26.
HURON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY.
No. 27.
Blaine S. SMITH, et al.
No. 34.
MARQUETTE CEMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY.
No. 25.
SUPERIOR PORTLAND CEMENT, Inc.
No. 28.
NORTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY.
No. 29.
RIVERSIDE CEMENT COMPANY.
No. 30.
UNIVERSAL ATLAS CEMENT COMPANY.
No. 31.
CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY.
No. 32.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 7, 1948
Messrs. P.B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., and G. T. Washington, Acting Sol. Gen., both of Washington, D. C., J. F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., C. H. Weston, R.G. Seaks, P. Elman, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., W. T. Kelley, Gen. Counsel, and Walter B. Wooden, Associate Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D. C., for Federal Trade Commission.
Messrs. W. J. Donovan and G. S. Leisure, both of New York City (Messrs. Donovan, Leisure, Newton, Lumbard & Irvine, and J. R. Withrow, Jr., H. H. Bond, and B. P. McAllister, all of New York City, and I. C. Werle, of Jamaica, N. Y., of counsel), for The Cement Institute and others.
Mr. H. W. Clark, of San Francisco, Cal. (Messrs. Morrison, Hohfeld, Foerster, Shuman & Clark, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for Santa Cruz Portland Cement Co.
Mr. Marshall P. Madison, of San Francisco, Cal. (Messrs. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for Pacific Portland Cement Co.
Mr. Edward D. Lyman, of L.A., Cal. (Messrs. Overton, Lyman, Plumb, Prince & Vermille, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for Southwestern Portland Cement Co.
Mr. Chaffee E. Hall, of San Francisco, Cal. (Messrs. Earl & Hall & Gerdes, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for Yosemite Portland Cement Co.
Mr. A. W. Witherspoo, of Spokane, Wash. (Messrs. Witherspoon & Witherspoon, of Spokane, Wash., of counsel), for Spokane Portland Cement Co.
Mr. Walter C. Fox, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal. (Messrs. Chickering & Gregory, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for Calaveras Cement Co.
Messrs. C. Wright, Jr. and L. A. Masselink, both of Detroit, Mich. (Messrs. Beaumont, Smith & Harris, of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for Huron Portland Cement Co.
Messrs. N. L. Miller, of New York, R. M. Blough, of Pittsburgh, J. H. Hershberger, of Chicago, for Universal Atlas Cement Co.
Messrs. Cahill, Gordon, Zachry & Reindel, of New York City (Messrs. Ray H. Luebbe, Neil C. Head and Robert M. Bozeman, all of New York City, of counsel), for General Electric Co., amicus curiae.
The petitions for rehearing in these cases are denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 U.S. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-trade-commission-v-the-cement-institute-scotus-1948.