Federal Trade Commission v. Moda Latina BZ Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided March 1, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-10832·Unknown

Opinion

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:20-cv-10832-FMO- ) SKx v. ) ) ORDER ON STIPULATION MODA LATINA BZ INC., a ) [55] RE: PERMANENT California corporation, ) INJUNCTION AND ) MONETARY JUDGMENT AGUIRRE, individually and as an ) officer of Moda Latina BZ Inc., and ) ) MARCO CESAR ZARATE QUÍROZ, ) individually and as an officer of Moda ) Latina BZ Inc., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission” or “FTC”), filed its Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (Dkt. 1, “Complaint”) in this matter, pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (“Telemarketing Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6108. The Commission and Defendants stipulate to the entry of a Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment (“Order”) to resolve all matters in dispute in this action between them. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter. 2. The Complaint charges that Defendants participated in deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6101-08, and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, offering for sale, and sale of work-at-home opportunities to consumers throughout the United States. These deceptive acts or practices included claiming falsely or without substantiation that consumers who purchased Defendants’ work-at-home opportunities were likely to earn substantial income, such as hundreds of dollars per week. The Complaint also charges that Defendants engaged in abusive telemarketing threats and intimidation. 3. Defendants neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Order. Only for purposes of this action, Defendants admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 4. Defendants waive and release any claims that they may have against the Commission and its agents that relate to this action, including any claim that they may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date of this Order, and agree to bear their own costs and attorney fees. 5. Defendants and the Commission waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Order. 6. The Corporate Defendant filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on December 16, 2020, see No. 2:20-bk- 20958-BB (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2020) (“Bankruptcy Case”). 7. Elissa D. Miller was appointed as the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee in the Bankruptcy Case. 8. This Court has jurisdiction to determine whether and to what extent this action is subject to the automatic stay in connection with the Bankruptcy Case. Lockyer v. Mirant, 398 F.3d 1098, 1105–07 (9th Cir. 2005) (collecting cases). 9. The FTC’s prosecution of this action and the entry of this Order are actions to enforce the Commission’s police or regulatory power and these actions are excepted from the automatic stay in the Bankruptcy Case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4). For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: A. “Corporate Defendant” means Moda Latina BZ Inc. and each of its successors, and assigns. B. “Defendants” means the Individual Defendants and Corporate Defendant, individually, collectively, or in any combination. C. “Document” is synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of the term “documents or electronically stored information” in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1)(A). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term. D. “Individual Defendant(s)” means Esther Virginia Fernandez Aguirre and Marco Cesar Zarate Quíroz, individually or collectively. E. “Investment Opportunity” includes anything, tangible or intangible, that is offered, offered for sale, sold, or traded based wholly or in part on representations, either express or implied, about past, present, or future income, profit, or appreciation. F. “Person” means a natural person, organization, or other legal entity, including a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, proprietorship, association, cooperative, government or governmental subdivision or agency, or any other group or combination acting as an entity. G. “Telemarketer” means any Person who, in connection with Telemarketing, initiates or receives telephone calls to or from a customer or donor. H. “Telemarketing” means any plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to induce the purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution, by use of one or more telephones and which involves more than one interstate telephone call. I. BAN ON SELLING GOODS OR SERVICES AS A MEANS TO EARN IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, whether acting directly or through any other person, officer, agent, employee, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, subsidiary, division, branch, trust, or other entity, are permanently restrained and enjoined from: A. creating, advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any good or service that is represented, directly or by implication, to a consumer as a means to earn money working from home or from any other location; B. assisting others engaged in advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any good or service that is represented, directly or by implication, to a consumer as a means to earn money working from home or from any other location; and C. holding any ownership interest, share, or stock in any business that engages in or assists in advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any good or service that is represented, directly or by implication, to a consumer as a means to earn money working from home or from any other location. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants’ officers, agents, and employees, and all others in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any good or service, are permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting or assisting others in misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any material fact, including: A. risk, liquidity, earnings potential, or profitability; and B. any other fact material to consumers such as: the total costs; any refund policy; any material restrictions, limitations, or conditions; or any material aspect of its performance, efficacy, nature, or central characteristics. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants’ officers, agents, and employees, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with Telemarketing of any go

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Trade Commission v. Moda Latina BZ Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Federal Trade Commission v. Moda Latina BZ Inc. (Federal Trade Commission v. Moda Latina BZ Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1746
1 U.S.C. § 1746
§ 16
11 U.S.C. § 16
Exceptions to discharge
11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A)
§ 6101-08
15 U.S.C. § 6101-08
Costs and fees
28 U.S.C. § 2412
§ 6101
15 U.S.C. § 6101
§ 57b
15 U.S.C. § 57b