Federal Trade Commission v. International Markets Live, Inc.
This text of Federal Trade Commission v. International Markets Live, Inc. (Federal Trade Commission v. International Markets Live, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 Phillip A. Silvestri, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11276 2 phillip.silvestri@gmlaw.com GREENSPOON MARDER LLP 3 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 400 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 978-4249 5 Fax: (954) 333-4256 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and CASE NO.: 2:25-cv-760-CDS-NJK 10 STATE OF NEVADA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A 13 RESPONSE AND/OR ANSWER TO 14 INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE, PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT INC., et al. 15 [First Request] Defendants. 16 ______________________________________/ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Defendants Global Dynasty Network, LLC. (“Global Dynasty”) and Matthew Rosa (““Rosa” 2 and together with Global Dynasty, “Defendants”), by through counsel, hereby move for an extension 3 of time of thirty-four (34) days to file and serve a response and or answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint 4 (ECF No. 1), which is currently due on May 27, 2025, through and including July 7, 2025. The 5 undersigned counsel for Defendants also represents Defendant Jason Brown (“Brown”), whose 6 response date is also July 7, 2025, such that the granting of this motion will result in all three Defendants have the same deadline by which to answer or respond to the Complaint. 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) provides that the Court, for good cause, may extend the time to answer or 7 otherwise respond to the Complaint. See also United States v. Alpine Sec. Corp., No. 2:22-CV-01279- 10 RFB-VCF, 2023 WL 8653135, at *1 (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2023). Here, Defendants’ motion is timely, and is made before the time in which they have to answer the Complaint has expired. Defendants make 12 the motion in anticipation that all Defendants represented by the undersigned might consolidate their 13 responses to the Complaint, thus servicing efficiency purposes for the case. This motion is made in good faith and not for purposes of improper delay. On May 23, 2025, counsel for Defendants conferred 1S with counsel for Plaintiffs. Counsel for Plaintiffs stated they did not oppose the relief requested herein. 16 Dated: May 27, 2025. Respectfully submitted, 17 18 GREENSPOON MARDER LLP 19 /s/Phillip Silvestri PHILLIP SILVESTRI 20 Nv. Bar No. 11276 Email: philip.silvestri@gmlaw.com 21 GREENSPOON MARDER LLP 9 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 IT 1S SO ORDERED. Las Vegas, NV 89159 23 || Dated: May 28, 2025 Tel: (702) 978-4249 24 |) 2 fo fo Attorneys for Defendants Jason 25 Nancy J. Kop ye Brown, Matt Rosa, and Global Dynasty 26 || United States Magistrate Judge Network, LLC 27 28 Page 2 of 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Federal Trade Commission v. International Markets Live, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-trade-commission-v-international-markets-live-inc-nvd-2025.