Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.

274 U.S. 543, 47 S. Ct. 663, 71 L. Ed. 1193, 1927 U.S. LEXIS 50
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 31, 1927
Docket279
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 274 U.S. 543 (Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543, 47 S. Ct. 663, 71 L. Ed. 1193, 1927 U.S. LEXIS 50 (1927).

Opinion

*544 Mr. Justice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of' the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.

Proper decision óf the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco- Company becomé party to the unlawful combination of.tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much' evidence the Commission gave affirmative answer to that query; but the Circuit Court of Appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. 9 Fed. (2d) 570.

It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of non-interference where conclusions of Circuit Courts of Appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations. And upon that ground alone we affirm the judgment below.

The opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals is of uncertain intendment and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates cléarly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto-

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western Star Trucks, Inc. v. Big Iron Equipment Service, Inc.
101 P.3d 1047 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2004)
Marr v. Wmx Technologies, Inc., No. Cv96-0071542s (Nov. 6, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12550 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. Larsen
656 A.2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
Magenau v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc.
360 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Dick v. New York Life Insurance
359 U.S. 437 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.
355 U.S. 396 (Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 U.S. 543, 47 S. Ct. 663, 71 L. Ed. 1193, 1927 U.S. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-trade-commission-v-american-tobacco-co-scotus-1927.