Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Capozzi

877 F.2d 727, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8824
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 1989
DocketNo. 87-1696
StatusPublished

This text of 877 F.2d 727 (Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Capozzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Capozzi, 877 F.2d 727, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8824 (8th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

In our earlier decision in this case, we upheld the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of claims brought by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (the FSLIC) in its capacity as conservator for Bohemian Savings and Loan Association (Bohemian). See FSLIC v. Capozzi, 855 F.2d 1319, 1326 (8th Cir.1988), petition for cert. filed, 57 U.S.L.W. 3522 (U.S. Feb. 2, 1989) (No. 88-1300). The United States Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari, vacated our judgment, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2058, 104 L.Ed.2d 624 (1989), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the Court’s decision in FSLIC v. Ticktin, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1626, 104 L.Ed.2d 73 (1989).

In Ticktin, the Supreme Court held federal subject matter jurisdiction exists for the type of lawsuit the FSLIC brings in this case. See id. 109 S.Ct. at 1627-29. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings on the FSLIC’s claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Ticktin
490 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 F.2d 727, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-savings-loan-insurance-v-capozzi-ca8-1989.