Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley
202 N.C. 836
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Carswell v. Talley, 192 N. C., 37, 135 S. E., 181, Robinson v. Williams, 189 N. C., 256, 126 S. E., 621, Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N. C., 455, 74 S. E., 465, LeDuc v. Brandt, 110 N. C., 289, 14 S. E., 778.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley, 202 N.C. 836 (N.C. 1932).
202 N.C. 836 (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Savannah Sugar Refining Co. v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Wilmington, Inc.
130 S.E.2d 33 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)