Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Katz

33 A.D.3d 755, 822 N.Y.S.2d 759
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 A.D.3d 755 (Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Katz, 33 A.D.3d 755, 822 N.Y.S.2d 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine claims to certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered January 5, 2005, which denied its motion for summary judgment and, upon searching the record, awarded summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint.

[756]*756Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Spark Real Estate, Inc.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment since it failed to establish a prima facie entitlement to such relief (see CPLR 3212; Ayotte v Gervasio, 81 NY2d 1062 [1993]).

Although the defendants did not move for summary judgment, the Supreme Court had the authority pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b) to search the record and award summary judgment to a nonmoving party with respect to an issue that was the subject of the motion before the court (see Dunham v Hilco Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 425, 429-430 [1996]; Murray v Murray, 28 AD3d 624 [2006]; Goldstein v County of Suffolk, 300 AD2d 441, 442 [2002]). Under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court properly exercised that authority in awarding summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.P, Santucci, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

534 Flatbush Holdings, LLC v. Solaris Props., LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 00207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Pope v. Safety & Quality Plus, Inc.
74 A.D.3d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Marciano v. Ran Oil Co. East, LLC
63 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Group v. Apple Mac & R Corp.
59 A.D.3d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Shearon
19 Misc. 3d 433 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Gonzalez v. Green
14 Misc. 3d 641 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.3d 755, 822 N.Y.S.2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-national-mortgage-assn-v-katz-nyappdiv-2006.