Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Warman

1930 OK 472, 292 P. 865, 145 Okla. 281, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 219
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 28, 1930
Docket21291
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 1930 OK 472 (Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Warman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Warman, 1930 OK 472, 292 P. 865, 145 Okla. 281, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 219 (Okla. 1930).

Opinion

HEFNER, J.

In this case the Industrial Commission made an award for permanent total disability to Sam Warman, the claimant, and in addition ■ thereto an award for permanent disfigurement.

. In the application to review in this court the petitioners contend that this award for permanent total disability was in lieu of all other awards and that the award for disfigurement should not be allowed in addition thereto.

Until section 7290, C. O. S. 1921, was amended by chapter 61, sec. 6, 1923 Session *282 Laws, no award could be made for loss of hearing or immanent disfigurement. Since the adoption of the amendment, however, an award can be made for these injuries. The amendment is as follows:

“In case of an injury resulting in the loss of hearing or in serious and permanent disfigurement of the head, face or hand, compensation shall be payable in an amount to be determined by the Commission, but not in excess of $3,000; provided, that compensation for the loss of hearing or permanent disfigurement shall not be in addition to the other compensation provided for in this section, but shall be taken into consideration in fixing the compensation otherwise provided.”

In the accident the claimant lost the sight of one eye, received an injury to the other, injuries to his face, nose, neck and hand, as the result of an explosion. The Commission made an award in his favor impermanent total disability and in addition thereto he was awarded $2,500 as compensation for disfigurement.

The statute provides that in case of an injury resulting in loss of hearing or in serious and permanent disfigurement of the face, head, or hand, compensation shall be payable in an amount to be determined by the Commission, but not in excess of $3,000. To this provision the Legislature attached a proviso which specifically says that compensation for loss of hearing or permanent disfigurement shall not be in addition to the other conrpensation provided for in this section, but shall be taken into consideration in fixing compensation otherwise provided. We think a fair and liberal interpretation of this amendment means that the Industrial Commission can take into consideration the disfigurement in making a finding of total disability. When, however, it has been found that a total disability exists, the maximum amount that can be allowed for total disability, including disfigurement, is the amount provided for by the statute for permanent total disability. The award of the Industrial Commission for the permanent total disability is affirmed, but as to the amount allowed in addition thereto for disfigurement it is vacated.

MASON, C. X, and CLARK, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JX, concur. LESTER, Y. C. X, and HUNT and RILEY, JJ., absent.

Note. — See under (2) 12 R. C. L. p. 1074; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 3254; (3) 12 R. C. L. p. 1076; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 3255.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G & G Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Gutierrez
1984 OK CIV APP 26 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1984)
Garrett's Furniture v. Morgan
1972 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1972)
Special Indemnity Fund v. Sims
1945 OK 288 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)
Asplund Construction Co. v. State Industrial Commission
1939 OK 219 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Farmers' Gin Co. v. Carpenter
1938 OK 126 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Brunstetter Motor Co. v. Brunstetter
1934 OK 401 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Pine v. Hill
1932 OK 529 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Seneca Coal & Coke Co. v. Quisenberry
1932 OK 32 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Smith
1931 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Slater Bros. Turnbuckle & Derrick Co. v. Felton
1930 OK 580 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK 472, 292 P. 865, 145 Okla. 281, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-mining-smelting-co-v-warman-okla-1930.