Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. Saunders

87 A.D.2d 859, 450 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 859 (Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. Saunders, 87 A.D.2d 859, 450 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, [860]*860J.), dated August 11, 1981, which denied the appellants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appellants are to serve their amended answer within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry thereof. The record justifies granting the motion permitting service of the amended answer and discloses no prejudice to the plaintiff (see Loomis v Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, [860]*860J.), dated August 11, 1981, which denied the appellants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appellants are to serve their amended answer within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry thereof. The record justifies granting the motion permitting service of the amended answer and discloses no prejudice to the plaintiff (see Loomis v Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 859, 450 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-land-bank-of-springfield-v-saunders-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack