Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Ledford

9 S.E.2d 804, 194 S.C. 347, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 120
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 8, 1940
Docket15112
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 9 S.E.2d 804 (Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Ledford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Ledford, 9 S.E.2d 804, 194 S.C. 347, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 120 (S.C. 1940).

Opinion

*366 The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The plaintiff in this suit seeks to foreclose a mortgage covering realty situated in the County of Spartanburg. The controversy between the parties relates to a claimed credit in the sum of $400.88. The proof shows that on January 5, 1935, this amount was turned over by the defendant, Alma E. Ledford, to F. Gentry Harris, an attorney at law, who died by his own hand on February 5, 1935. The money in the form of a-check was delivered to Mr. Harris by the named defendant, to be forwarded to the plaintiff as a credit on her mortgage. It is undisputed that the money was never received by the plaintiff.

The question presented by the appeal is whether or not Harris received the amount as an agent for the plaintiff.

The matter was referred to Honorable Leroy Moore, Master in equity for Spartanburg County, under a general order of reference. By his report he disallowed the claimed credit, and recommended the foreclosure of the mortgage. Upon exceptions being taken to his report by the defendants to the Circuit Court, that Court rendered the judgment now appealed from, sustaining the exceptions and allowing the credit for $400.88.

We have carefully studied the record, and are convinced that the conclusions reached by the Master in equity in his excellent order are sound and correct, and we adopt his report as the opinion of this Court, and direct that it be published.

Judgment reversed, and case remanded for such further orders as may be necessary for carrying out the recommendations of the Master.

Mr. ChiEe Justice Bonham, Messrs. Justices Baker and Stukes and Mr. Acting Associate Justice J. Strom Thurmond concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spence v. Spence Ex Rel. Spence
628 S.E.2d 869 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)
Watkins v. Mobil Oil Corp.
352 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
ZIV Television Programs, Inc. v. Associated Grocers, Inc.
114 S.E.2d 826 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
Fochtman v. Clanton's Auto Auction Sales
106 S.E.2d 272 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Twitty v. Harrison
95 S.E.2d 879 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.E.2d 804, 194 S.C. 347, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-land-bank-of-columbia-v-ledford-sc-1940.