Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Finglass
This text of 96 F. App'x 894 (Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Finglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dean Scott Finglass appeals the district court’s order and judgment of interpleader granting Karen Ann Leimbach’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Finglass, 2004 WL 422618, No. CA-03-81AMD (D.Md. Jan. 20, 2004). We grant Finglass’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-kemper-life-assurance-co-v-finglass-ca4-2004.