Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
162 N.E. 507, 248 N.Y. 517, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1309
Opinion
In each action order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the negative. Held, that section 50, subdivision 1, of the Civil Practice Act, in so far as it prescribes a limitation in actions to recover damages for malpractice, refers to actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the misconduct of physicians, surgeons and others practicing a profession similar to those enumerated.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Federal International Banking Company v. Touche, 162 N.E. 507, 248 N.Y. 517, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1309 (N.Y. 1928).
162 N.E. 507 (Federal International Banking Company v. Touche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.
749 N.E.2d 161 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Johnson v. Haugland
303 N.W.2d 533 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1981)
Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.
604 F.2d 737 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Kambas v. St. Joseph's Mercy Hosp. of Detroit
189 N.W.2d 879 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Seger v. Cornwell
44 Misc. 2d 994 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Di Pietro v. Hecker
43 Misc. 2d 630 (New York County Courts, 1964)
Tobra Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Harris
12 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Peters v. Powell
22 Misc. 2d 509 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)