Federal Insurance v. Kimbrough

116 A.D.2d 692, 497 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51547
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 116 A.D.2d 692 (Federal Insurance v. Kimbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Insurance v. Kimbrough, 116 A.D.2d 692, 497 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration on an uninsured motorist claim, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered November 7, 1984, which denied its application.

Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs payable by respondent Lumberman’s Mutual Casualty Company, petitioner’s application granted, and arbitration permanently stayed.

It is incumbent upon an insurer which has disclaimed insurance coverage to come forward with proof that it had validly canceled the policy prior to the date of the accident (see, Matter of American Sec. Ins. Co. [Novoa], 97 AD2d 541, 542). The insurer can satisfy that burden by presenting evidence of an office practice geared to insure the likelihood that a notice of cancellation is always properly addressed and mailed (see, Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray, 46 NY2d 828, 830; Anzalone v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 92 AD2d 238). In the instant case, the sole witness to testify at the hearing was an underwriter employed by the respondent insurer who had no personal knowledge of or participation in its mailing procedures. Under the circumstances, there is insufficient proof on the record to support a conclusion that the policy issued by respondent insurer on behalf of Cebage Taxi, the owner of the vehicle involved in the collision, had been properly canceled [693]*693prior to the date of the accident. Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Government Employees Insurance v. Brunner
69 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
AutoOne Insurance v. Schulere
60 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Gamble
250 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Allstate Insurance v. Ramirez
208 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Morales
207 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cherian
202 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Paramount Insurance v. Moctezuma
201 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Eagle Insurance v. Tichman
185 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Worldwide Underwriters Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
181 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Insurance of North America v. Castillo
158 A.D.2d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Sea Insurance v. Kopsky
137 A.D.2d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.2d 692, 497 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-insurance-v-kimbrough-nyappdiv-1986.