Federal Insurance v. Guterma

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Federal Insurance v. Guterma

379 So. 2d 1014, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15529

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 1980

DocketNo. 79-2485

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 So. 2d 1014 (Federal Insurance v. Guterma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federal Insurance v. Guterma, 379 So. 2d 1014, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15529 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

BERANEK, Judge.

This is a petition for common law certio-rari seeking review of the trial court’s order which denied the defendants/petitioners’ request to amend the answer previously filed. The amendment sought to assert a new defense not previously pled. Certiorari is denied because we conclude that even if error has been committed, it can be corrected by appeal after final judgment. Chal[1015]*1015fonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th. DCA 1979); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland, 311 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See also: Esler v. Gabinet, 369 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BERANEK, Judge.

This is a petition for common law certio-rari seeking review of the trial court’s order which denied the defendants/petitioners’ request to amend the answer previously filed. The amendment sought to assert a new defense not previously pled. Certiorari is denied because we conclude that even if error has been committed, it can be corrected by appeal after final judgment. Chal[1015]*1015fonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th. DCA 1979); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland, 311 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See also: Esler v. Gabinet, 369 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 So. 2d 1014, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-insurance-v-guterma-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack