Federal Insurance Co. v. Unigard Mutual Insurance
347 So. 2d 788
Opinion
We find that the trial court erred in failing to make provision for any recovery by the appellant, Federal Insurance Company, for future compensation benefits to be paid the injured employee. See Ramar-Dooley Construction Co. v. Norris, 341 So.2d 546 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, that portion of the order on equitable distribution is hereby reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions that a hearing be conducted in accordance herewith. In all other respects the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Federal Insurance Co. v. Unigard Mutual Insurance, 347 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
347 So. 2d 788 (Federal Insurance Co. v. Unigard Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ramar-Dooley Constr. Co. v. Norris
341 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)