Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corportation v. Hitchcock

Superior Court of Maine·Decided July 13, 2016·No. CUMre-14-70·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, SS CIVIL ACTION Docket No. RE-14-70

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ST.A T:: o r:- MArN Cu mber,6 -~ .. , E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office

Plaintiff

JUL 1,.a 2016

v.

RE Cc. /VEO

EDWARD HITCHCOCK, LINDA JUDGMENT OF HITCHCOCK, and CITIZENS FORECLOSURE AND SALE LENDING GROUP, INC. , Title to Real Estate Is Involved Defendants

88 Alba Street, Portland, Maine and Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, Book 24480, Page 114 TOWN AND COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Party in Interest

Before the court is plaintiff's post-trial brief in support of its proposed judgment of foreclosure. For the following reasons, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff.

I. FACTS On September 29, 2006, Edward and Linda Hitchcock executed and delivered a note in the amount of $166,000.00 to Citizens Lending Group, Inc. (Citizens). The note was secured by a mortgage on real property located at 88 Alba Street in Portland. On October 23 , 2013 , Quicken Loans, Inc., plaintiff's servicer, sent the Hitchcocks a notice stating that the Hitchcocks were in default as of September 1, 2013 . On January 2, 2014, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), acting as nominee for Citizens, assigned the mortgage to Quicken Loans.

Quicken Loans so_ught a judgment of foreclosure by complaint filed February 27, 2014.

The Hitchcocks were served in Auburndale, Florida on March 4, 2014, but have not answered

the complaint or otherwise appeared in this action. Trial was scheduled for September 3, 2014, however Quicken Loans moved to continue following the Law Court's decision in Bank ofAm. v. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, 96 A. 3d 700. On February 17, 2015 , Quicken Loans amended its complaint, with leave of court. The amended complaint added one count of declaratory judgment against Citizens, which sought a judgment that Quicken Loans owned the mortgage and had standing to foreclose . The Hitchcocks were served with the amended complaint on April 9, 201 5.

Quicken Loans filed a return of service for Cit.izens on May 4, 2015 , which indicated that National Registered Agents, Inc. was served on behalf of Citizens on April 23 , 2015 . On May 28, 2015 , Quicken Loans assigned the mortgage to plaintiff. On June 12, 2015 , plaintiff was substituted as plaintiff in place of Quicken Loans. Plaintiff moved for a default judgment on the declaratory judgment count on November 12, 2015 . Trial was held on December 3, 2015 . Plaintiff filed a post-trial brief in support of its requests for declaratory judgment and a judgment of foreclosure on March 3, 2016.

Also on March 3, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of time to file a return of service for Citizens. Plaintiff asserted that, in September 2015 , National Registered Agents had sent a letter stating that it was unable to receive documents on behalf of Citizens due to lack of a forwarding address. Because the letter was sent to the wrong address, plaintiffs attorney was unaware of the issue until February 2016 . The court granted the motion on March 10, 20 16. On May 23 , 2016, plaintiff filed a return of service for Citizens, which showed that Citizens was served in hand on March 1, 2016 . On June 14, 2016, plaintiff moved to dismiss the declaratory judgment count on the ground that Citizens had executed a quitclaim assignment, dated June 8, 2016, purporting to assign to plaintiff any interest it held in the mortgage.

I~

II. DISCUSSION To obtain a judgment of foreclosure, the mortgagee must establish: the existence of a mortgage, including the property description and book and page number of its recording; proof of ownership of the note and mortgage, including all assignments and endorsements; a breach of condition in the mortgage ; the amount due, including any reasonable attorney ' s fees and court costs; the order of priority and any amounts that may be due to other parties in interest; evidence of a properly served notice of default and the mortgagor's right to cure; proof of completed mediation; and, if the mortgagor has not appeared, a statement as to whether the mortgagor is in military service. Chase Home Fin. LLC v. Higgins, 2009 ME 136, 111 , 985 A.2d 508.

1. Existence of Mortgage

Plaintiff has provided the mortgage, which contains a property description, street address, and book and page number of recording. (Pl.'s Ex. B.)

2. Ownership of Note

The mortgagee may certify proof of ownership of the note by establishing that it is in possession of the note, and the note is endorsed in blank. Bank ofAm. v. Cloutier, 2013 ME 17, 1 18, 61 A.3d 1242. Plaintiff has provided the note and an allonge, which contains an endorsement from Citizens to Flagstar Bank, and an endorsement in blank from Flagstar. 1 (Pl. ' s Ex. A.)

3. Ownership of Mortgage

When MERS acts solely as nominee, an assignment from MERS transfers only the right to record the mortgage as nominee. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, 1116-17, 96 A.3d 700 . The assignments in this case show that MERS , acting as nominee for Citizens, assigned the mortgage

I The note itself contains a separate endorsement to Flagstar, which is stamped with "NOTE ENDORSEMENT VOID ." To the extent that the voided endorsement raises questions about the validity of the endorsements on the allonge, the quitclaim assignment, discussed below, resolves those questions in favor of plaintiffs ownership.

from Citizens to Quicken Loans. (Pl. 's Ex. C.) To remedy this issue, plaintiff has provided a quitclaim assignment from Citizens. (Ex. A to Mot. Dismiss.) The Law Court has indicated that a quitclaim assignment from the original lender to the plaintiff is sufficient to establish the plaintiffs ownership of the mortgage. See Nationstar Mortg. , LLC v. Halfacre, 2016 ME 97, ~ 6, _ A.3d _ ("We recognize that the trial court apparently was not presented with the Fannie Mae quitclaim assignment, and therefore that the trial court had no reason to question the quitclaim assignment to Nationstar and the representations of counsel that Nationstar's assignment was effective."). Plaintiff therefore has standing and is entitled to a judgment of foreclosure if it can establish the remaining elements. See Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ~ 9, 96 A.3d 700.

4. Breach

At trial, plaintiff moved to admit records of the Hitchcock's payment history with Quicken Loans. (Pl. 's Ex. E.) To establish the records ' admissibility, plaintiff offered the testimony of Kristin Wykowski, an employee of Quicken Loans. Ms. Wykowski's testimony established that: ( 1) the records were made at or near the time by someone with knowledge; (2) the records were kept in the course of Quicken Loans ' s regularly conducted activities; (3) making the records was a regular practice of those activities; (4) Ms. Wykowski was the custodian of the records; and (5) neither the source of information nor the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. M.R. Evid. 803(6); see HSBC Mortg. Servs. v. Murphy, 2011 ME 59, ~ 10, 19 A.3d 815. The payment history records are therefore admitted. The records and testimony at trial establish that the Hitchcocks failed to make the September 1, 2013 payment and have not made any payments since that time.

5. Amount Due

The payment history records and testimony at trial also establish that, as of December 3, 2015, the total amount due under the note and mortgage was $185,498.85 . (Pl.'s Ex. E.) Plaintiffs attorney ' s affidavit of attorney's fees and costs shows that, as of December 1, 2015 , plaintiff has incurred $6,990.00 in attorney's fees and $1,375.76 in costs. (Pl. 's Ex. G.) These amounts are supported by itemized lists. See HSBC Bank USA, NA. v. Gabay, 2011 ME 101 , ~ 27, 28 A.3d 1158.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corportation v. Hitchcock, (Me. Super. Ct. 2016).

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corportation v. Hitchcock (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corportation v. Hitchcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Home Finance LLC v. Higgins
2009 ME 136 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2009)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Gabay
2011 ME 101 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2011)
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Murphy
2011 ME 59 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2011)
Bank of America, N.A. v. James A. Cloutier
2013 ME 17 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2013)
Bank of American, N.A. v. Scott A. Greenleaf
2014 ME 89 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2014)
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Timothy E. Halfacre
2016 ME 97 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2016)