Federal Fence Co. v. BankAtlantic

600 So. 2d 19, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6109, 1992 WL 109972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1992·No. No. 91-3375·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See generally Analytical Sys., Inc. v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 696 F.Supp. 1469 (N.D.Ga.1986); David v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 59 Misc.2d 248, 298 N.Y.S.2d 847 (N.Y.App.Div.1969); see also Seidel Belt Corp. v. Kennedy Photo Engraving, Inc., 153 N.Y.S.2d 951 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1956); National Processed Foods Corp. v. Rubel Corp., 265 A.D. 879, 38 N.Y.S.2d 40 (N.Y.App.Div.1942); Leav v. Weitzner, 268 A.D. 466, 51 N.Y.S.2d 775 (N.Y.App.Div.1944).

HERSEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Fence Co. v. BankAtlantic, 600 So. 2d 19, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6109, 1992 WL 109972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 19 (Federal Fence Co. v. BankAtlantic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Analytical Systems, Inc. v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.
696 F. Supp. 1469 (N.D. Georgia, 1986)
National Processed Foods Corp. v. Rubel Corp.
265 A.D. 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Leav v. Weitzner
268 A.D. 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
David v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
59 Misc. 2d 248 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)