Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Holding

5 S.E.2d 557, 216 N.C. 503, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 27
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1939·Published

Opinion

Devin, J.

The court below was in error in holding that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the judgment sustaining the demurrer ore tenus to the complaint and dismissing the action must be, in that respect, reversed. Ramsey v. Furniture Co., 209 N. C., 165, 183 S. E., 536; Avery County v. Braswell, 215 N. C., 270.

*505 This disposition of the appeal renders it unnecessary to consider the question, raised by defendants’ demurrer to the reply, as to the validity of the waiver agreement contained in the application for the loan and in, the deed of trust executed by defendants. As to that we express no ■opinion.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Holding, 5 S.E.2d 557, 216 N.C. 503, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 27 (N.C. 1939).

5 S.E.2d 557 (Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Holding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramsey v. Nash Furniture Co.
183 S.E. 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Avery County v. Braswell
1 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)