Federal Election Commission v. Franklin
This text of 902 F.2d 3 (Federal Election Commission v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the Commission’s motion for summary affirmance prior to briefing and the opposition thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that the Commission’s motion for summary affirmance is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the protective order imposed by the district court and those portions of the district court’s order specifying the time by which Franklin must respond to the Commission’s questions is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court shall require Franklin to respond to the Commission’s questions forthwith, and in no case more than five days after the court’s judgment is entered.
[4]*4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mandate of this Court shall issue forthwith.
Entered at the direction of Chief Judge ERVIN, with the concurrence of Judge CHAPMAN and Judge WILKINSON.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
902 F.2d 3, 1989 WL 205798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-election-commission-v-franklin-ca4-1989.