Federal Election Commission v. Franklin

902 F.2d 3, 1989 WL 205798
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 1989·No. Nos. 89-1512, 89-1525·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Commission’s motion for summary affirmance prior to briefing and the opposition thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that the Commission’s motion for summary affirmance is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the protective order imposed by the district court and those portions of the district court’s order specifying the time by which Franklin must respond to the Commission’s questions is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court shall require Franklin to respond to the Commission’s questions forthwith, and in no case more than five days after the court’s judgment is entered.

[4]*4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mandate of this Court shall issue forthwith.

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge ERVIN, with the concurrence of Judge CHAPMAN and Judge WILKINSON.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Election Commission v. Franklin, 902 F.2d 3, 1989 WL 205798 (4th Cir. 1989).

902 F.2d 3 (Federal Election Commission v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related