Federal Deposit Insurance v. Schupler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Schupler

101 A.D.2d 895, 475 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18616

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 1984·Published

Opinion

Motion by appellant to stay an order of commitment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 6, 1984, pending determination of the appeal from said order. U Motion denied on the ground that appellant has failed to make a sufficient showing of merit to her appeal (see Garner v United States, 424 US 648; G-Fours, Inc. v Miele, 496 F2d 809; People v Melski, 10 NY2d 78; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Salesmen Unlimited Agency Corp., 101 AD2d 876; Roberts v Pollack, 92 AD2d 440). 11 Temporary stay contained in the order to show cause dated April 16,1984 vacated. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to stay an order of commitment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 6, 1984, pending determination of the appeal from said order. U Motion denied on the ground that appellant has failed to make a sufficient showing of merit to her appeal (see Garner v United States, 424 US 648; G-Fours, Inc. v Miele, 496 F2d 809; People v Melski, 10 NY2d 78; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Salesmen Unlimited Agency Corp., 101 AD2d 876; Roberts v Pollack, 92 AD2d 440). 11 Temporary stay contained in the order to show cause dated April 16,1984 vacated. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Schupler, 101 A.D.2d 895, 475 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

101 A.D.2d 895 (Federal Deposit Insurance v. Schupler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related