Federal Deposit Insurance v. Northwood Projects, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Northwood Projects, Inc.

67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 961 (Federal Deposit Insurance v. Northwood Projects, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Northwood Projects, Inc., 67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 18, 1978, as denied its motion for summary judgment as to the individual defendants. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to the respondents who [962]*962filed one brief. There are issues of fact in this case, and thus the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Our affirmance should not be taken as an indication that we agree with the totality of the reasons given by Special Term in its decision. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 18, 1978, as denied its motion for summary judgment as to the individual defendants. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to the respondents who [962]*962filed one brief. There are issues of fact in this case, and thus the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Our affirmance should not be taken as an indication that we agree with the totality of the reasons given by Special Term in its decision. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-deposit-insurance-v-northwood-projects-inc-nyappdiv-1979.