Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ciaffoni

107 A.2d 214, 176 Pa. Super. 97, 1954 Pa. Super. LEXIS 439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ciaffoni. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 Pa. Super. 91
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 13, 1954·No. Appeal, No. 62·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The averments in this case are identical with those in the appeal in Number 61 April Term, 1954 except as to the number and amount of the checks paid by the First National Bank in Cecil and the fact that the checks were not signed by defendant personally but were drawn by him on his account as Manager of Muse Soccer Club. The same legal principles are applicable in disposing of the appeal.

The judgment for defendant entered on the pleadings is reversed with a procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ciaffoni, 107 A.2d 214, 176 Pa. Super. 97, 1954 Pa. Super. LEXIS 439 (Pa. Ct. App. 1954).

107 A.2d 214 (Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ciaffoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.