Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc.

Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc.

788 A.2d 98, 258 Conn. 949, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 535
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 10, 2001
DocketSC 16645
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 788 A.2d 98 (Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc., 788 A.2d 98, 258 Conn. 949, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 535 (Colo. 2001).

Opinion

The petition of the defendants Guardian Systems, Inc., and Jerome G. Terracino for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 397 (AC 20525), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the applicable equitable principles, the plaintiff was entitled to the full amount of the deficiency judgment in this case?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.
815 A.2d 157 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.
814 A.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 A.2d 98, 258 Conn. 949, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-deposit-insruance-v-mutual-communications-associates-inc-conn-2001.