Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc.
788 A.2d 98, 258 Conn. 949, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 535
Opinion
The petition of the defendants Guardian Systems, Inc., and Jerome G. Terracino for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 397 (AC 20525), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the applicable equitable principles, the plaintiff was entitled to the full amount of the deficiency judgment in this case?”
SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc., 788 A.2d 98, 258 Conn. 949, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 535 (Colo. 2001).
788 A.2d 98 (Federal Deposit Insruance v. Mutual Communications Associates Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.
815 A.2d 157 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.
814 A.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)