Federal Cement Co. v. Shaffer

Third Circuit

Federal Cement Co. v. Shaffer

229 F. 1021, 143 C.C.A. 662, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1916

DocketNo. 2058

StatusPublished

This text of 229 F. 1021 (Federal Cement Co. v. Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federal Cement Co. v. Shaffer, 229 F. 1021, 143 C.C.A. 662, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620 (3d Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in this case, the Federal Cement Company, having filed a bill in equity in the District Court to No. 1407, September term, 1915, in which this controversy can ho more satisfactorily heard and determined, and having offered to pay into the District Court the money Involved in this suit, it seems to us that the best way to meet the difficulties presented on this writ of error is to assent to the company’s offer, and to reverse the judgment formally, but without expressing an opinion on the legal questions discussed below. 225 Fed. 893. It is therefore ordered that if the Cement Company, on or before the 4th day of March, 1916, pay into the District Court-in the equity proceeding referred to above the amount of coupon interest sued for in this action, with interest thereon, the clerk of this court is directed to enter an order reversing the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in this case, the Federal Cement Company, having filed a bill in equity in the District Court to No. 1407, September term, 1915, in which this controversy can ho more satisfactorily heard and determined, and having offered to pay into the District Court the money Involved in this suit, it seems to us that the best way to meet the difficulties presented on this writ of error is to assent to the company’s offer, and to reverse the judgment formally, but without expressing an opinion on the legal questions discussed below. 225 Fed. 893. It is therefore ordered that if the Cement Company, on or before the 4th day of March, 1916, pay into the District Court-in the equity proceeding referred to above the amount of coupon interest sued for in this action, with interest thereon, the clerk of this court is directed to enter an order reversing the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 F. 1021, 143 C.C.A. 662, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-cement-co-v-shaffer-ca3-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack