Feder v. Caliguira
This text of 17 Misc. 2d 880 (Feder v. Caliguira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contract herein involved for the hiring of a coin-operated phonograph comes within the purview of section 399 of the General Business Law. The automatic renewal clause was rendered inoperative by reason of plaintiff’s failure to give the notice required by this section. (See Melodies, Inc. v. La Pierre, 4 A D 2d 982; Peerless Towel Supply Co. v. Triton Press, 3 A D 2d 249; Archer v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 218 N. Y. 18; Matter of New York Post v. Liebowitz, 2 N Y 2d 677.)
The order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs, and motion denied. Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment unanimously reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted.
Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Benjamin, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Misc. 2d 880, 191 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feder-v-caliguira-nyappterm-1959.