Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward Serzysko, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant
This text of 409 F.2d 1360 (Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward Serzysko, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
409 F.2d 1360
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412
Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,
v.
The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 22, 1969.
Decided May 20, 1969.
Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.
A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-respondent-appellant.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WYATT, District Judge.1
PER CURIAM:
We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for the reason stated in the thorough and well reasoned opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
Sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F.2d 1360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-sec-l-rep-p-92412-edward-serzysko-plaintiff-appellant-appellee-v-ca2-1969.