Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company

730 F.2d 910
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 28, 1984·No. 920·Published

Opinion

730 F.2d 910

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408
Phyllis SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THRALL CAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 920, Docket 83-7888.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued March 19, 1984.
Decided March 28, 1984.

Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., New York City, on brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before MANSFIELD, NEWMAN and PRATT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr., Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co., 582 F.Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y.1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company, 730 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1984).

730 F.2d 910 (Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.
582 F. Supp. 945 (S.D. New York, 1983)