Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company
This text of 730 F.2d 910 (Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
730 F.2d 910
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408
Phyllis SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THRALL CAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 920, Docket 83-7888.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued March 19, 1984.
Decided March 28, 1984.
Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.
Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., New York City, on brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before MANSFIELD, NEWMAN and PRATT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr., Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co., 582 F.Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
730 F.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-sec-l-rep-p-91408-phyllis-sanders-v-thrall-car-manufacturing-ca2-1984.