Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. Kwasnik
This text of Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. Kwasnik (Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. Kwasnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
r~t/
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION D9C:KpT NO. AP-12-03. 2 f) 0 I rz 0A vV - c.JJv'\ -- (Q 1 1.5 · ·'
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
V. ORDER
MAREK KWASNIK AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS
[J This matter came before the court on an appeal by Kwasnik from the entry of a ~
forcible entry and detainer judgment on May 30, 2012. Kwasnik now asks the Superior
Court as part of his appeal to grant his request for a jury trial and his motion to stay
issuance of the writ of possession. Kwasnik contends that he is entitled to a jury trial on
issues of promissory estoppel, estoppel by misrepresentation, estoppel by representation,
equitable estoppel. Mr. K wasnick contends that there was an agreement between him and
Linda Kames, a prior owner of the subject property located at 88 Peaked Mountain Road,
Sebago, Maine, in which he alleges that he would be allowed to live at this property
through retirement in exchange for his work on and around the house. He claims the
estimated value of the his work on the property is in excess of $50,000.
The property located at 88 Peaked Mountain Road, Sebago, was addressed in a
previous appeal by Kwasnik. In Linda Karnes v. Marek Kwasnik, Maine Supreme
Judicial Court, Decision No. Mem-11-180 (November 29, 2011), the Court affirmed the
Superior Court's denial of Kwasnik's request for a jury trial de novo, the forcible entry
and detainer judgment of the District Court and denied Kwasnik's motion to stay
issuance of the writ of possession. In that action, Kwasnik contended that his six -year romantic relationship with Linda Karnes created a legal interest in her property entitling
him to a jury trial on the issue oftitle to the property.
The court takes judicial notice of the fact that Linda Barnes no longer has any
interest in the real estate located at 88 Peaked Mountain Road, Sebago as the result of a
foreclosure judgment in Mechanic Savings Bank v. Linda E. Karnes, District Court,
Bridgton Docket No. BRl-RE-11-17 (November 8, 2011).
In the pending action, Kwasnik now claims that by virtue of another agreement
with Linda Barnes, he is entitled to continue to live in this property until his retirement
because he performed work on this property with a value in excess of $50,000. It should
be noted that in a forecible entry and detainer action that Ms. Barnes brought against him
he did not raise this claim alleging an agreement to live in the house until his retirement.
He did claim in that action his labor created some interest. Notably in that action he
claimed that "the only agreement" he had with Ms. Barnes was that he would have a 50%
interest in the property. A forcible entry and detainer judgment was entred against
Kwasnik in the action brought by Ms. Barnes.
Forcible entry and detainer is a summary proceeding to determine a single issue;
namely, who is entitled to immediate possession ofthe property." Frost Vacationland
Props., Inc. v. Palmer, 1999 ME 15,1 8, 723 A. 2d 418,421. In this case, the District
Court found that the only person or entity entitled to possession is Federal National
Mortgage Association.
M.R.Civ.P. 80D(g) provides: "Forcible entry and detainer actions shall not be
joined with any other action, nor shall a defendant in such action file any counterclaim."
Kwasnik is not free to pursue against Federal National Mortgage Association claims of promissory estoppel, estoppel by misrepresentation, estoppel by representation, or
equitable estoppel based on agreements he now alleges he had with Ms. Barnes.
The entry is:
Request for jury trial de novo is DENIED.
Request for a stay of writ of possession is DENIED.
The Judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Appeal DISMISSED.
Clerk is directed to issue a writ of possession.
Date: June 15, 2012 ~Wheeler Justice, Superior Court
Federal National Mortgage Associatio~ Esq Leonard Morley, Esq and William Jar an,
Marek Kwasnik-Pro Se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. Kwasnik, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-natl-mortgage-assn-v-kwasnik-mesuperct-2012.