Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Hill

547 S.W.3d 158

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105407

StatusPublished

This text of 547 S.W.3d 158 (Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Hill, 547 S.W.3d 158 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*159Roland Hill, Jr., and Chontay Hill appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Respondent Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) on Fannie Mae's petition for unlawful detainer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*159Roland Hill, Jr., and Chontay Hill appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Respondent Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) on Fannie Mae's petition for unlawful detainer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 S.W.3d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-natl-mortg-assn-v-hill-moctapp-2018.