Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch

6 N.E.3d 1204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2014·No. 2013-1833·Published

Opinion

Geauga App. No. 2012-G-3084, 2013-Ohio-4423. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II only; cause held for the decision in 2013-0304, Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta, 9th Dist. Medina No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur but would accept both propositions of law. Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch, 6 N.E.3d 1204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

6 N.E.3d 1204 (Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Bank of Am. v. Kuchta

2012 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)

Opinion

Related