Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch

6 N.E.3d 1204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2014·No. 2013-1833·Published

Opinion

Geauga App. No. 2012-G-3084, 2013-Ohio-4423. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II only; cause held for the decision in 2013-0304, Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta, 9th Dist. Medina No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur but would accept both propositions of law. Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch, 6 N.E.3d 1204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

6 N.E.3d 1204 (Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Bank of Am. v. Kuchta

2012 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)

Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Koch

2013 Ohio 4423 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Opinion

Related