Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n

Supreme Court

Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n

135 S. Ct. 2049, 191 L. Ed. 2d 954, 83 U.S.L.W. 3835, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3147

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 4, 2015

DocketNo. 14–840.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S. Ct. 2049 (Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2049, 191 L. Ed. 2d 954, 83 U.S.L.W. 3835, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3147 (U.S. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of NRG Energy, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to the following Questions: 1) Whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission reasonably concluded that it has authority under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.,to regulate the rules used by operators of wholesale electricity markets to pay for reductions in electricity consumption and to recoup those payments through adjustments to wholesale rates. 2) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the rule issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is arbitrary and capricious. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Justice ALITOtook no part in the consideration or decision of motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of NRG Energy, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiaegranted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to the following Questions: 1) Whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission reasonably concluded that it has authority under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.,to regulate the rules used by operators of wholesale electricity markets to pay for reductions in electricity consumption and to recoup those payments through adjustments to wholesale rates. 2) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the rule issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is arbitrary and capricious. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Justice ALITOtook no part in the consideration or decision of motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S. Ct. 2049, 191 L. Ed. 2d 954, 83 U.S.L.W. 3835, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-energy-regulatory-commn-v-elec-power-supply-assn-scotus-2015.