Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fleet Credit Corp.

616 So. 2d 488, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2473
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1993
Docket91-1202
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 616 So. 2d 488 (Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fleet Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fleet Credit Corp., 616 So. 2d 488, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2473 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

616 So.2d 488 (1993)

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for First Commercial Bank of Florida, Appellant,
v.
FLEET CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 91-1202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 9, 1993.

Adorno & Zeder and Brian K. Goodkind and Amber E. Donner, Coconut Grove, and Gregory Gore, Sebastian, for appellant.

Gary Barcus, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of a garnishor on a claim that its judgment lien was superior to the garnishee-bank's security interest in a certificate of deposit pledged by its customer as security for a loan. Without reaching the merits, we conclude that the circuit court was without subject matter jurisdiction over the case after the bank was declared insolvent and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation appointed as receiver. See FDIC v. Shain, Schaffer & Rafanello, 944 F.2d 129, 132 (3d Cir.1991) (federal statutory framework provides exclusive remedy for claims against the assets of a failed bank).

We held accordingly, in Department of Ins. v. FDIC, 610 So.2d 695, 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), that claims against a failed bank, after the FDIC has been appointed receiver, "must be commenced or continued in the United States District Court for the district within which the depository institution's *489 principal place of business is located or in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(6)(A) (1989 & Supp. 1992)."

Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haire v. Overseas Holdings Ltd. Partnership
908 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Robbins v. Foothill Nissan
22 Cal. App. 4th 1769 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 488, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fed-deposit-ins-corp-v-fleet-credit-corp-fladistctapp-1993.