Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING & SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 26, 5th Cir., 1992 965 F.2d 1347)
To the extent that our opinion of June 26, 1992, 965 F.2d 1347, is in conflict with Reiter v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1213, 122 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993), it has been overruled. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The case is thus REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in the light of Reiter and of our opinion.
Finally, no active judge having requested that the court be polled, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
990 F.2d 184 (Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.