Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

Fifth Circuit

Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

990 F.2d 184, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9036, 1993 WL 124631

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1993

Docket91-1320

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 990 F.2d 184 (Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company, 990 F.2d 184, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9036, 1993 WL 124631 (5th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING & SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 26, 5th Cir., 1992 965 F.2d 1347)

Before GOLDBERG, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

To the extent that our opinion of June 26, 1992, 965 F.2d 1347, is in conflict with Reiter v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1213, 122 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993), it has been overruled. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The case is thus REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in the light of Reiter and of our opinion.

Finally, no active judge having requested that the court be polled, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI