Fechtman v. Stover

Indiana Supreme Court

Fechtman v. Stover

217 N.E.2d 587, 247 Ind. 498, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 387

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 22, 1966

DocketNo. 19,508

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 217 N.E.2d 587 (Fechtman v. Stover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fechtman v. Stover, 217 N.E.2d 587, 247 Ind. 498, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 387 (Ind. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

I concur in the denial of the petition to transfer, but I do so upon the ground that I do not think that instructions numbers 22 and 25 given by the trial court are pertinent, for the reason that the statute referred to is not applicable, since the Act refers merely to buildings, and in my opinion does not cover concrete steps on a walkway, [499]*499eight to ten feet from the building, when reference is made in the Act to “stairway and stairways.”

Note. — Reported in 217 N. E. 2d 587.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

I concur in the denial of the petition to transfer, but I do so upon the ground that I do not think that instructions numbers 22 and 25 given by the trial court are pertinent, for the reason that the statute referred to is not applicable, since the Act refers merely to buildings, and in my opinion does not cover concrete steps on a walkway, [499]*499eight to ten feet from the building, when reference is made in the Act to “stairway and stairways.”

Note. — Reported in 217 N. E. 2d 587.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 N.E.2d 587, 247 Ind. 498, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fechtman-v-stover-ind-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack