Fechtman v. Stover

Indiana Supreme Court

Fechtman v. Stover

217 N.E.2d 587, 247 Ind. 498, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 387

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1966·No. No. 19,508·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

I concur in the denial of the petition to transfer, but I do so upon the ground that I do not think that instructions numbers 22 and 25 given by the trial court are pertinent, for the reason that the statute referred to is not applicable, since the Act refers merely to buildings, and in my opinion does not cover concrete steps on a walkway, [499] eight to ten feet from the building, when reference is made in the Act to “stairway and stairways.”

Note. — Reported in 217 N. E. 2d 587.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

I concur in the denial of the petition to transfer, but I do so upon the ground that I do not think that instructions numbers 22 and 25 given by the trial court are pertinent, for the reason that the statute referred to is not applicable, since the Act refers merely to buildings, and in my opinion does not cover concrete steps on a walkway, [499] eight to ten feet from the building, when reference is made in the Act to “stairway and stairways.”

Note. — Reported in 217 N. E. 2d 587.

Fechtman v. Stover, 217 N.E.2d 587, 247 Ind. 498, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 387 (Ind. 1966).

Pincite

217 N.E.2d 587 (Fechtman v. Stover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related